Extract/validate needs to guess descriptor type
See original GitHub issueOverview
Currently, this one will not work as expected:
report = validate(descriptor='datapackage.yaml') # will be handled as a default (resource)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Dynamic type validation in TypeScript - LogRocket Blog
As you can see, a new function has been defined, called validate , which receives as a parameter an ExampleType object, with which...
Read more >descriptors - a package for easy input validation - GitHub
A collection of descriptors for validating input data. - GitHub - bheinzerling/descriptors: A collection of descriptors for validating input data.
Read more >Value extraction for cascaded validation and type argument ...
Value extraction is needed when constraints are applied to the element(s) stored within a container type. There are two categories: Cascaded validation of ......
Read more >Chapter 7 Working with validate | The Data Validation Cookbook
Chapter 7 Working with validate. In this section we dive deeper into the the central object types used in the package: the validator...
Read more >soql validation rules - Salesforce Developer Community
I would lik to query all validation rules that contain a condition ... SELECT Id, ValidationName, Active, Description, EntityDefinition.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hey, Just updating that I’m planning to work on the enhancement soon, probably on the weekend.
@mor120 What I meant is to add an additional type check. Currently, we infer
source
type with the existent code. My idea is to add a similar inferring code todescriptor
if it’s provided.So it’s not a bug; it’s a possible enhancement