Paket 4.x install command takes hours to complete (while 3.x takes minutes)
See original GitHub issueDescription
Paket 4.x install command takes a very long time to process my paket.dependencies
. I let it run for ~hour and then just killed it. Paket 3.x handled it without problems.
I’m on windows.
Repro steps
- Clone https://github.com/pmbanka/paket-perf-repro
- Run
paket_old.exe install
git add .; git reset --hard
- Try running
paket.exe install
Expected behavior
Both versions should end running in short time.
Actual behavior
paket.exe install
takes > 1h
Known workarounds
Use Paket 3.x.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:20 (19 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Extremely slow package resolution with min strategy #2442
Using this paket.dependencies file, paket takes an extremely long time to perform a restore without a lock file.
Read more >Package installation time is getting *drastically* vary, how ...
Sometime those package installation takes 5 mins and sometime goes till 30+ mins. Since I know it had been installed in 5 mins,...
Read more >hplip software installation gets stuck on sudo apt ...
I tried installing hplip software to make it work, ... I just keeps rolling and doesn't complete the step or proceed further.
Read more >C2960 IOS Upgrade (archive tftp) very slow
The Time measured with ftp is 7 Minutes and 30 seconds, which is actually quite good compared to 21 minutes. Now, sine I...
Read more >El Capitan. no packages were eligible for install.
I've got a macbook pro 3.1 that was working alright but I bought a newer one so I took the SSD and did...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I just wanted to say thank you to everyone working on the issue. Watching you resolving this from a poor repro in just a few days made my jaw drop on the floor. You are awesome and I hope next time I’ll be able to help and participate more!
Omg I merged your branch and get exactly the same 😦. Seems like my fix/additional change neglects your improvements?!