RFC: change default of group setting storage to none in Paket 6
See original GitHub issueI propose we change the default of the storage
setting to none
. Currently the default is set to packages
but since more and more users convert to SDK style projects that switch feels wrong.
More details: https://fsprojects.github.io/Paket/dependencies-file.html#Disable-packages-folder
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:11
- Comments:8 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
With-defaults Capability for NETCONF RFC 6243
1. 'explicit' Basic Mode Retrieval When data is retrieved from a server using the 'explicit' basic mode, and the <with-defaults> parameter is not...
Read more >A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings RFC 8808
A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings (RFC 8808, August 2020)
Read more >RFC 2460: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification
Introduction IP version 6 (IPv6) is a new version of the Internet Protocol, designed as the successor to IP version 4 (IPv4) [RFC-791]....
Read more >RFC 951: Bootstrap Protocol
If non-volatile storage is available, we suggest keeping default settings there and bypassing the BOOTP protocol unless these settings cause the file ...
Read more >How to configure DNS dynamic updates in Windows Server
Describes that how to configure DNS dynamic updates in Windows Server and how to integrate DNS updates with DHCP.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Yes, 100% and framework auto detect makes package resolution so much faster!
Why resolve all transatives for every framework…ain’t nobody got time for that.
Well, I’m not 100% sure the above is correct, just an assumption which should be tested. Otherwise I think changing the default is not a bad idea if that scenario “just works”.