JSON-LD components should accept `key` so that they handle multiple instances per page.
See original GitHub issueThe title says it all. The JSON-LD spec allows for multiple instances, essential for blog rolls or search pages. key
seems like the most canonical way to handle this behavior, perhaps retaining the default key as a prefix. What do you think?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:8 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
JSON-LD 1.1 - W3C
JSON is a useful data serialization and messaging format. This specification defines JSON-LD 1.1, a JSON-based format to serialize Linked ...
Read more >Writing JSON-LD structured data: A beginners guide for SEOs
Before we delve into JSON-LD syntax and writing your own structured data, there are a few key terms you'll need to know.
Read more >How to mark up your own resource with Bioschemas
2. Map elements to properties. Now, focus on a particular profile and have ... Bioschemas (and Schema.org) recommends JSON-LD so we will use ......
Read more >How can I correctly implement Schema.org with multiple lists ...
Use multiple json-ld scripts ... I think the best/simple idea is to use two seperate lists "objects" (And add name/url/and so on for...
Read more >array of LocalBusinessJsonLd Schema using next-seo
specify the unique keyoverride properties if you page needs multiple instances for a JSON-LD <ExampleJsonLd keyOverride="my-new-key" /> take ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Hey @marco-000 yeah Carousel is something I would like to add in the near future.
Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.