question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

(www) Conflicting types on dot-org graphql schema

See original GitHub issue

Description

warn There are conflicting field types in your data.

If you have explicitly defined a type for those fields, you
 can safely ignore this warning message.
Otherwise, Gatsby will omit those fields from the GraphQL
schema.

NPMPackage.types.ts:
 - type: boolean
   value: false
 - type: string
   value: 'included'

Steps to reproduce

Run gatsby develop on www.

Expected result

No warnings.

Actual result

The above warning.

Environment

  System:
    OS: macOS Mojave 10.14.6
    CPU: (4) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4558U CPU @ 2.80GHz
    Shell: 3.2.57 - /bin/bash
  Binaries:
    Node: 10.16.1 - /usr/local/bin/node
    Yarn: 1.19.1 - ~/.yarn/bin/yarn
    npm: 6.13.6 - /usr/local/bin/npm
  Languages:
    Python: 2.7.16 - /usr/bin/python
  Browsers:
    Chrome: 79.0.3945.130
    Firefox: 70.0.1
    Safari: 13.0.4
  npmPackages:
    gatsby: ^2.18.8 => 2.18.22 
    gatsby-design-tokens: ~1.0.10 => 1.0.10 
    gatsby-image: ^2.2.34 => 2.2.38 
    gatsby-plugin-canonical-urls: ^2.1.16 => 2.1.19 
    gatsby-plugin-catch-links: ^2.1.19 => 2.1.24 
    gatsby-plugin-emotion: ^4.1.16 => 4.1.21 
    gatsby-plugin-feed: ^2.3.23 => 2.3.26 
    gatsby-plugin-google-analytics: ^2.1.29 => 2.1.33 
    gatsby-plugin-google-tagmanager: ^2.1.18 => 2.1.24 
    gatsby-plugin-guess-js: ^1.1.26 => 1.1.29 
    gatsby-plugin-layout: ^1.1.16 => 1.1.21 
    gatsby-plugin-mailchimp: ^2.2.3 => 2.2.3 
    gatsby-plugin-manifest: ^2.2.31 => 2.2.37 
    gatsby-plugin-mdx: ^1.0.59 => 1.0.67 
    gatsby-plugin-netlify: ^2.1.28 => 2.1.31 
    gatsby-plugin-netlify-cache: ^0.1.0 => 0.1.0 
    gatsby-plugin-nprogress: ^2.1.15 => 2.1.18 
    gatsby-plugin-offline: ^3.0.27 => 3.0.31 
    gatsby-plugin-react-helmet: ^3.1.16 => 3.1.21 
    gatsby-plugin-sharp: ^2.3.5 => 2.3.13 
    gatsby-plugin-sitemap: ^2.2.22 => 2.2.25 
    gatsby-plugin-theme-ui: ^0.2.43 => 0.2.53 
    gatsby-plugin-twitter: ^2.1.15 => 2.1.18 
    gatsby-plugin-typography: ^2.3.18 => 2.3.21 
    gatsby-remark-autolink-headers: ^2.1.19 => 2.1.23 
    gatsby-remark-code-titles: ^1.1.0 => 1.1.0 
    gatsby-remark-copy-linked-files: ^2.1.31 => 2.1.36 
    gatsby-remark-embedder: ^1.11.0 => 1.7.0 
    gatsby-remark-graphviz: ^1.1.18 => 1.1.21 
    gatsby-remark-images: ^3.1.35 => 3.1.42 
    gatsby-remark-normalize-paths: ^1.0.0 => 1.0.0 
    gatsby-remark-prismjs: ^3.3.25 => 3.3.30 
    gatsby-remark-responsive-iframe: ^2.2.28 => 2.2.31 
    gatsby-remark-smartypants: ^2.1.17 => 2.1.20 
    gatsby-source-airtable: ^2.0.12 => 2.0.12 
    gatsby-source-filesystem: ^2.1.40 => 2.1.46 
    gatsby-source-git: ^1.0.2 => 1.0.2 
    gatsby-source-npm-package-search: ^2.1.19 => 2.1.22 
    gatsby-transformer-csv: ^2.1.19 => 2.1.24 
    gatsby-transformer-documentationjs: ^4.1.20 => 4.1.23 
    gatsby-transformer-remark: ^2.6.39 => 2.6.48 
    gatsby-transformer-screenshot: ^2.1.44 => 2.1.49 
    gatsby-transformer-sharp: ^2.3.7 => 2.3.12 
    gatsby-transformer-yaml: ^2.2.18 => 2.2.23 
  npmGlobalPackages:
    gatsby-cli: 2.8.26

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 4 years ago
  • Comments:6 (5 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

1reaction
jzabalacommented, Aug 10, 2020

Hi, I would like to take this one. I’ll assign it to me 🙂

it would be helpful if the error message print also the property/field name

@muescha after reading the code I realized the error says what the problematic property/field is: NPMPackage.types.ts, that types.ts is the field with the problem.

The problem is that the field ts from Algolia comes with the values specified in the error: sometimes the string 'included' others the boolean false. I haven’t found much info about this field on the internet but it looks like the only two possible values are 'included' or false, so, we could change that 'included' to true unless someone knows about another possible string value different that 'included'. Or we could do the inverse and change false to some string like 'notIncluded'.

0reactions
LekoArtscommented, Sep 9, 2020

Since we moved the source for the website this isn’t a concern for www anymore. However, the source plugin itself could get this improvement (and another fix). I opened a new issue for it, @jzabala if you want to tackle it let us know in the issue: https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/26836

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

There are conflicting field types in your data. GraphQL schema ...
Summary I have some variables named payload and returnType, but they are just javascript objects, which I'm passing down as context when ...
Read more >
Conflicts for types - Advanced GraphQL
Example 3: Merging schemas with naming conflicts for types. Consider the following two schemas: Schema A : const typeDefs = ` type Query...
Read more >
GraphQL union and conflicting types - Stack Overflow
Teaser & Program have the same title field with a different type ( String vs String! ) Here is parts from Zone ,...
Read more >
How to fixed GraphQl Fields conflicting types. Use different ...
Fields conflict because they return conflicting types. Use different aliases on the fields to fetch both if this was intentional.
Read more >
Schemas and Types - GraphQL
Character is a GraphQL Object Type, meaning it's a type with some fields. Most of the types in your schema will be object...
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found