Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Comments between statement don't parser
See original GitHub issueInput:
if (true) {
$a = 1;
}
// Don't parsed :(
if (false) {
$a = 2;
}
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:10 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to ignore single line comments in a parser-combinator
I am extending RegexParsers for my parser and ignoring whitespace (the default way), so I am losing the new line characters anyway. I...
Read more >mypy cannot parse type comment of "with" and "for" statement ...
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/#type-comments I tried to check type comments, but it cannot parse "with" and "for" statement as below.
Read more >How are comments usually parsed?
Python comes to mind and it has a very simple answer: no block comments. You start a comment with # and then the...
Read more >Parsing XML while ignoring comments/mixed context/PI
Let's say I have three boolean variables representing whether or not to ignore comments, mixed context and PIs in an XML document
Read more >Parse Predictable Patterns Using an Anchor | Sumo Logic Docs
This topic describes how to use the parse anchor UI tool to add parsing to a query and provides details on the structure...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@nevadascout, @rasmusbe, can you please give me your point of view on this major change on the next release ?
In the next release, I can provide a structure more close to
babylonparser with anleadingCommentsarray :@ichiriac we implement logic as
jsprettier based onbabylon. He have alsocomments(https://astexplorer.net/#/gist/3202ee068c3e3f3645588357d931216f/14a080841262821fa733893886d8fc99ac711795) and it is good 👍