An option to place config in a dedicated file (not in the .vscode/setting.json)
See original GitHub issueGood day!
Thanks for taking care of this super useful module!
We use it as the default way to build css from scss in our projects. So the module config is actually a part of the project and should be version controlled. But the config is stored in .vscode/setting.json
, which contains env specific stuff like, for example, peacock settings and lots of others, that should be set differently for different users.
Could we store vscode-live-sass-compiler’s settings separately (as an option)? In a special config file or in some generic sass setting file (if it exists)?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:10 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
User and Workspace Settings - Visual Studio Code
json file. You can open the settings. json file with the Preferences: Open Settings (JSON) command in the Command Palette (Ctrl+Shift+P). Once the...
Read more >Add ability to extend from other settings files #15909 - GitHub
An option to place config in a dedicated file (not in the .vscode/setting.json) glenn2223/vscode-live-sass-compiler#171.
Read more >VSCode Missing settings in settings.json file - Stack Overflow
Open the command palette (either with F1 or Ctrl + Shift + P ) · Type "open settings" · And then choose Open...
Read more >VSCode settings.json | vs code settings.json - YouTube
How to find settings. json file in VSCode ? VSCode settings. json not working or not applying? In this tutorial we will locate...
Read more >Setting up VSCode to use with the dbt CLI - Show and Tell
(optional) add to the requirements.txt what packages w/ versions you plan to do in this project (example below); create a new file .vscode/settings.json...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
No, I understood what you wanted. However, as I said, I had my reservations;
settings.json
file itself, it would have one thing, but the result would differ without any obvious reason as to whyIt’s also worth noting that microsoft/vscode#15909 will also work in this way (settings from work overridden by user’s personal
settings.json
)The files you’re referring to are the start and end of the hierarchy, but the settings in VSCode are hierarchical.
Sorry don’t mean to be argumentative in any way, just want to make my points. This is all very much in the air so I’m open to being convinced that there is a better way
Sorry, I thought I’d replied to this.
I don’t think you can trigger an extension method with a task. I think they’re more for things like building (may be wrong though)
I had a thought. As you want to have separate user and project settings, why not strip user settings from the
.vscode/settings.json
file and then use VSCode’s user settings for personalisation settings?FYI: still planning on implementing it in the future. However, more in line with being global (not overwritable)