No fuzzer binaries found
See original GitHub issueI created a job and uploaded my zip, however it’s complaining with:
2019-02-08 13:51:08,359 - run_bot - INFO - Checking for bad build.
2019-02-08 13:51:08,654 - run_bot - ERROR - Error occurred while working on task.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "src/python/bot/startup/run_bot.py", line 98, in task_loop
commands.process_command(task)
File "/home/vadi/Programs/Mudlet/mudlet1/clusterfuzz/src/python/bot/tasks/commands.py", line 147, in wrapper
return func(task)
File "/home/vadi/Programs/Mudlet/mudlet1/clusterfuzz/src/python/bot/tasks/commands.py", line 360, in process_command
run_command(task_name, task_argument, job_name)
File "/home/vadi/Programs/Mudlet/mudlet1/clusterfuzz/src/python/bot/tasks/commands.py", line 190, in run_command
task_module.execute_task(task_argument, job_name)
File "/home/vadi/Programs/Mudlet/mudlet1/clusterfuzz/src/python/bot/tasks/fuzz_task.py", line 1342, in execute_task
data_directory, testcase_count)
File "/home/vadi/Programs/Mudlet/mudlet1/clusterfuzz/src/python/bot/tasks/fuzz_task.py", line 742, in run_fuzzer
testcase_count)
File "/home/vadi/Programs/Mudlet/mudlet1/clusterfuzz/src/python/bot/fuzzers/builtin.py", line 72, in run
'No fuzzer binaries found in |BUILD_DIR| directory.')
BuiltinFuzzerException: No fuzzer binaries found in |BUILD_DIR| directory.
What exactly is it talking about?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:14
Top Results From Across the Web
36C3 - No source, no problem! High speed binary fuzzing
Fuzzing is the method of choice for finding security vulnerabilities in ... but it struggles to find deep paths in complex programs, ...
Read more >Vulnerability-oriented directed fuzzing for binary programs
In this paper, we propose a vulnerability-oriented directed greybox fuzzing method on binary program whose source code is not available. To ...
Read more >Fuzzing with afl-fuzz — AFL 2.53b documentation
Non -instrumented binaries can be fuzzed in the QEMU mode (add -Q in the command line) or in a traditional, blind-fuzzer mode (specify...
Read more >Fuzzing binary-only programs with AFL++ - AFLplusplus
However, if there is only the binary program and no source code available, then standard afl-fuzz -n (non-instrumented mode) is not effective.
Read more >ANTIFUZZ: Impeding Fuzzing Audits of Binary Executables
state-of-the-art fuzzers cannot find bugs in binary executables protected with ANTIFUZZ anymore. Moreover, we find that our approach introduces no ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
To clarify since I think this issue has caused some confusion, for a binary to be recognized as a fuzzer it should have a function called LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput. The logic for determining if a binary is a fuzzer is here.
The libFuzzer target someone gives to ClusterFuzz doesn’t necessarily need to be compiled with
-fsanitize=fuzzer
but it should be a working libFuzzer target.-fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link
does not do this,-fsanitize=fuzzer
can do this but it is not the only way.Ah this is the issue. The program you give to ClusterFuzz must be compiled with
-fsanitize=fuzzer
at some point (assuming you aren’t doing blackbox fuzzing or AFL).I strongly recommend libFuzzer though. Probably best to read the libFuzzer docs so you understand how to make a libFuzzer-based target. Once you have one, you can upload it to ClusterFuzz.
Maybe we should make this clearer in the docs.
Good luck and let us know if you run into other trouble.