Significant compile-time regression vs. 2.0.15
See original GitHub issueWe are observing a significant (~2X) compile-time regression using the latest Error Prone from git master vs. 2.0.15. We strongly suspect that the updated version of javac
(9-dev-r3297-1
vs. 1.9.0-dev-r2973-2
) is the cause of the problem. Unfortunately I don’t have a small test case I can share at this point to make it easy to reproduce (working on it). Posting this issue in case anyone else has noticed this regression and has a workaround, a pointer to an upstream JDK 9 issue, etc.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:13 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
1.56 Compile time is through the roof!? : r/rust - Reddit
It used to compile in release mode in under 2.30 but now I'm getting over 8 minutes of generated heat in my small...
Read more >LLVM 15 Compile Time With Burst - Neil Henning
With the Burst compiler that I work on here at Unity, we use LLVM to produce highly performant codegen from the High Performance...
Read more >ChangeLog - Eigen - TuxFamily
Bug 1637 Workaround performance regression in matrix products with gcc>=6 and clang>=6.0. Changeset bf0f100339c1: Fix some implicit 0 to Scalar ...
Read more >Cloud Composer release notes | Google Cloud
These release notes apply to the Cloud Composer service. You can periodically check this page for announcements about new or updated features, bug...
Read more >build performance regression from waf-1.8.22 to waf-1.9.0
I have tried to bisect by checking various waf versions and it seems to me that the most noticeable jump in build time...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@msridhar thanks for confirming! I’ll get the release started.
@kageiit
google-java-format
only depends on javac for parsing, it doesn’t do any compilation. It shouldn’t by affected by this.@msridhar - the latest snapshot includes the fix: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/com/google/errorprone/error_prone_ant/2.0.16-SNAPSHOT/