Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Marker-based AR
See original GitHub issueThe AR capabilities are great but require special instructions and aren’t widely available out of the box.
Would be nice to have an option for supplying marker-based AR which doesn’t require anything other than getUserMedia() (works on most modern browsers I believe).
Perhaps using OpenCV with the Aruco module enabled? At a glance it looks to me like this would work, though I’m not sure if camera calibration is necessary or if it can somehow be gotten by looking up runtime info available to the browser, in a database that can give back camera stats?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:7
- Comments:10 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@dakom FWIW this is the most recent high-level library I am aware of that offers marker-based tracking: https://github.com/jeromeetienne/AR.js
We have not really talked about it as a team yet, but speaking for myself I like this idea a lot.
I have seen a couple of libraries over the years that help with marker-based AR, both high level and low. What is the state of the art?