Support / Documentation for limited device authorisation flow
See original GitHub issueAccording to this page “OAuth 2.0 for TV and Limited-Input Device Applications” is generally supported in the google apis. However, I couldn’t find any hint about it in the google-api-dotnet-client.
Maybe the AuthorizationCodeFlow
can be used for this, but I couldn’t find any example.
Finally I managed to implement a draft version of this authorisation workflow for youtube. In case this would be an enhancement for the google-api-dotnet-client, I’m willing to contribute it and make it more robust. However, I would need some support to understand how and where to integrate into the existing code base.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:9 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Device Authorization Flow
Learn how the Device Authorization flow works and why you should use it for input-constrained devices, such as smart TVs and media consoles....
Read more >OAuth 2.0 for TV and Limited-Input Device Applications
This document explains how to implement OAuth 2.0 authorization to access Google APIs via applications running on devices like TVs, game consoles, and...
Read more >OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grant
The OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grant (formerly known as the Device Flow) is an OAuth 2.0 extension that enables devices with no browser...
Read more >Authorize browserless and input-limited devices
The device flow is initiated by the browserless or input-constrained device when a user requests to login. Implement a backend endpoint that will...
Read more >OAuth Device Flow
The OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grant (aka Device Flow) is an extension to the original OAuth 2.0 spec. It solves the problem of...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This an #1812 are the same, and we are tracking both on the backlog. Removing this one from the backlog as duplicate in #2223
OK, as I wrote I did not get it. I thought after glancing at the documentation that limited device auth was the way of authorizing by “external” browser. Thanks for the quick answers.