Test failures in Python 3.11.0b3

Environment details

• Programming language: Python
• OS: Fedora 37 (rawhide)
• Language runtime version: Python 3.11.0b3
• Package version: v1.20.6

Steps to reproduce

1. Run pytest in Python 3.11.0b3

The first failure appears in test_total_ordering_w_other_enum_type:

____________________ test_total_ordering_w_other_enum_type _____________________
    def test_total_ordering_w_other_enum_type():
        to_compare = enums_test.OneEnum.SOME_VALUE
    
        for item in enums_test.OtherEnum:
            assert not to_compare == item
>           assert to_compare.SOME_VALUE != item
tests/test_enum_total_ordering.py:52: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
self = <enum.property object at 0x3ffa350e550>
instance = <OneEnum.SOME_VALUE: 1>, ownerclass = <enum 'OneEnum'>
    def __get__(self, instance, ownerclass=None):
        if instance is None:
            try:
                return ownerclass._member_map_[self.name]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(
                        '%r has no attribute %r' % (ownerclass, self.name)
                        )
        else:
            if self.fget is None:
>               raise AttributeError(
                        '%r member has no attribute %r' % (ownerclass, self.name)
                        )
E               AttributeError: <enum 'OneEnum'> member has no attribute 'SOME_VALUE'
/usr/lib64/python3.11/enum.py:198: AttributeError

The second is in test_enum_alias_good:

_____________________________ test_enum_alias_good _____________________________
    def test_enum_alias_good():
        # Have to split good and bad enum alias into two tests so that the generated
        # file descriptor is properly created.
        # For the python runtime, aliases are allowed by default, but we want to
        # make sure that the options don't cause problems.
        # For the cpp runtime, we need to verify that we can in fact define aliases.
>       class GoodMessage(proto.Message):
tests/test_fields_enum.py:386: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
tests/test_fields_enum.py:387: in GoodMessage
    class GoodEnum(proto.Enum):
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
mcls = <class 'proto.enums.ProtoEnumMeta'>, name = 'GoodEnum'
bases = (<enum 'Enum'>,)
attrs = {'_generate_next_value_': <function Enum._generate_next_value_ at 0x3ffa5a8f560>, '__module__': 'test_fields_enum', '__qualname__': 'test_enum_alias_good.<locals>.GoodMessage.GoodEnum', 'UNKNOWN': 0, 'DEFAULT': 0}
    def __new__(mcls, name, bases, attrs):
        # Do not do any special behavior for `proto.Enum` itself.
        if bases[0] == enum.IntEnum:
            return super().__new__(mcls, name, bases, attrs)
    
        # Get the essential information about the proto package, and where
        # this component belongs within the file.
        package, marshal = _package_info.compile(name, attrs)
    
        # Determine the local path of this proto component within the file.
        local_path = tuple(attrs.get("__qualname__", name).split("."))
    
        # Sanity check: We get the wrong full name if a class is declared
        # inside a function local scope; correct this.
        if "<locals>" in local_path:
            ix = local_path.index("<locals>")
            local_path = local_path[: ix - 1] + local_path[ix + 1 :]
    
        # Determine the full name in protocol buffers.
        full_name = ".".join((package,) + local_path).lstrip(".")
        filename = _file_info._FileInfo.proto_file_name(
            attrs.get("__module__", name.lower())
        )
    
        # Retrieve any enum options.
        # We expect something that looks like an EnumOptions message,
        # either an actual instance or a dict-like representation.
        pb_options = "_pb_options"
        opts = attrs.pop(pb_options, {})
        # This is the only portable way to remove the _pb_options name
        # from the enum attrs.
        # In 3.7 onwards, we can define an _ignore_ attribute and do some
        # mucking around with that.
        if pb_options in attrs._member_names:
>           idx = attrs._member_names.index(pb_options)
E           AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'index'
../../BUILDROOT/python-proto-plus-1.20.6-1.fc37.noarch/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/proto/enums.py:61: AttributeError

For the second one, one of my coworkers found that _member_names is now a dict from a recent PR.

[hroncok]

AttributeError: <enum ‘OneEnum’> member has no attribute ‘SOME_VALUE’

This is because enum members do no longer have attributes with all other enum members.

Python 3.10:

>>> from enum import Enum
>>> class Color(Enum):
...     RED = 1
...     GREEN = 2
...     BLUE = 3
... 
>>> Color.RED
<Color.RED: 1>
>>> Color.RED.RED
<Color.RED: 1>
>>> Color.RED.RED.RED
<Color.RED: 1>
>>> Color.RED.RED.RED.BLUE
<Color.BLUE: 3>
>>> Color.RED.RED.RED.BLUE.BLUE.GREEN.RED
<Color.RED: 1>

Python 3.11:

>>> from enum import Enum
>>> class Color(Enum):
...     RED = 1
...     GREEN = 2
...     BLUE = 3
... 
>>> Color.RED
<Color.RED: 1>
>>> Color.RED.RED
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/enum.py", line 198, in __get__
    raise AttributeError(
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: <enum 'Color'> member has no attribute 'RED'

That assert there IMHO makes no sense because to_compare.SOME_VALUE is to_compare and the same assertion passed in the above line.

[parthea]

@hroncok , The patch looks great. Please could you open a PR?