Adding `if_exists="override" Mode
See original GitHub issueIs your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
is there mode to do truncate load for existing table if_exists="override"
, it could be useful to avoid dropping table
Describe the solution you’d like being able to override data in existing table.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5
Top Results From Across the Web
Replace and overwrite instead of appending - python
Open the file in 'w' mode, you will be able to replace its current text save the file with new contents. Share.
Read more >Hive - INSERT INTO vs INSERT OVERWRITE Explained
INSERT OVERWRITE is used to replace any existing data in the table or partition and insert with the new rows.
Read more >INSERT OVERWRITE - Spark 3.0.0-preview Documentation
The INSERT OVERWRITE statement overwrites the existing data in the table using the new values. The inserted rows can be specified by value...
Read more >E45 readonly option is set (add ! to override) - Ask Ubuntu
I'm trying to configure the extension mcrypt in my Ubuntu Server VirtualBox for work in my phpMyAdmin page. I ran vi /etc/php5/mods-available/mcrypt.ini and ......
Read more >"Write Database overwrite mode" — RapidMiner Community
If "'overwrite' mode is more or less the equivalent to DROP IF EXISTS followed by CREATE TABLE and INSERT" then after creating new...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
correct i like to replace the data, but keep the table intact. dropping table always has risk of losing table metadata, and could cause failing queries for the time between drop and create.
override
is safer operation.Could such an implementation also be considered for the
replace
mode? The time between “drop” and “create” can be significant for larger tables and results in the failure of downstream queries.Could the
replace
mode be re-implemented with a more atomic solution, i.e.:What would be the downsides?