com.google.fonts/check/032: name table descriptions length
See original GitHub issueFor Archivo, I get the following fail:
>> com.google.fonts/check/032 with ((u'font[0]', '/Users/marc/Documents/googlefonts/manual_font_cleaning/Archivo/Archivo/fonts/ttf/Archivo-Regular.ttf'),)
Description strings in the name table must not exceed 100 characters.
* FAIL: Namerecords with ID=10 (NAMEID_DESCRIPTION) are longer than 100 characters and should be removed.
In the MS nametable spec, there is no mention of any limitation for this nameID.
As a side note, for nameID13 (license description) it is always over 100 characters if the font is ofl.
Can we make this nameID greater than 100 characters please?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:14 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Google Title + Meta Description Length Checker + Preview Tool
Better Titles & Meta Descriptions = MORE clicks. Use this free tool to see how your titles and meta descriptions appear in Google....
Read more >Skip TTF-only checks for OTF fonts #2040 - GitHub
PASS: Description strings in the name table must not exceed 200 characters. ... PASS All description name records have reasonably small ...
Read more >Tables | Google developer documentation style guide
Use a description list (or, in some contexts, a table). Each item is three or more pieces of related data. A set of...
Read more >REST Resource: tables | BigQuery - Google Cloud
A user-friendly description of this table. ... The field name. ... Maximum length of values of this field for STRINGS or BYTES.
Read more >Google's Title and Meta Descriptions Length (Updated 2022)
But if you're already happy with your current title, you can choose to add your site name at the end of the title...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Really appreciate you investigating this! your conclusion makes sense
The Archivo description string has 199 chars. I think it is reasonable to update the max-length to 200 chars then. And I will also make the check emit WARNs instead of FAILs when such length is exceeded.