Hotfix changed SIL OFL License to Apache
See original GitHub issue1. I ran fontbakery-check-ttf.py for this file.
Here is the Font Info
INFO HOTFIXED: License file LICENSE.txt exists but NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) value is not specified for that. Value was: "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL"
2. Fixed ttf here
Result:
This Font Software is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. This license is available with a FAQ at www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:17 (14 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Use the Open Font License(OFL) instead of the Apache license
Sadly the license won't be changed to Apache 2.0. We want to publish JetBrain Mono in Google fonts and having SIL OFL is...
Read more >Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project
This license is sometimes referred to as the 3-clause BSD license. The modified BSD license is not bad, as lax permissive licenses go,...
Read more >Font licenses explained - FontsArena
Simple permission explanations for free fonts licenses like SIL OpenFont, Apache, MIT. What do those licenses mean? Can I use the fonts commercially?...
Read more >The Open Font License and Reserved Font Names - LWN.net
SIL encourages type designers to use RFNs, however, citing four reasons in a paper entitled "Web Fonts and Reserved Font Names." First, the...
Read more >What are the differences between OFL and Apache License ...
Apache allows a font to be sold in any manner, while the OFL requires that the font be bundled with some (almost any)...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
aha! 😄
sounds great!
Let me know if this still needs any further tweaks. I think we’re good now.