.CodeMirror-sizer min-width exceeds by far the screen width
See original GitHub issueNot sure what’s going on but min-width generated by codemirror.js is causing me issues:
<div class="CodeMirror-sizer" style="margin-left: 31px;min-height: 5279.5px;min-width: 2437.61px;"><div style="position: relative; top: 525px;">
How best can I check why it’s using such big oversized dimensions?
Thanks for any help, this plugin really rocks for reading css code!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:8 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
min-width - CSS: Cascading Style Sheets - MDN Web Docs
The min-width CSS property sets the minimum width of an element. It prevents the used value of the width property from becoming smaller...
Read more >CSS Media Min-Width & Max-Width Queries - How They Work
Learn to use media max width and min width to develop responsive emails ... Most media queries are set to trigger at certain...
Read more >CSS Properties – Max-width, Min-width, Max-height, and Min ...
If the width is less than 350px, it takes 80% of whatever the current screen size is. But as soon as the width...
Read more >html - Sticky footer not working when min-width is greater than ...
Issue: On mobile devices, when viewing the website vertically, the footer is not pushed to the bottom of the screen but instead just...
Read more >Min-width , Max-width & Media Queries - Medium
According to the below example “buttonWrapper” class element will take 70% width to all the screen widths which are greater than or equal...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Works perfectly. Thank you!
@thomasheyenbrock I will try things out today, and let you know!