Tracking Issue for Load Balancing being Experimental
See original GitHub issueSpecific usages:
LoadBalancer
ManagedChannelBuilder.loadBalancerFactory
PickFirstLoadBalancerFactory
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:31 (15 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Tech Talk: Video Load Balancing Beyond Health Checks
Load balancers that use active healthchecks to kick out servers may unnecessarily lose traffic when healthchecks fail to be representative of real traffic ......
Read more >Experimental Setup for Investigating the Efficient Load ... - MDPI
In this paper, we have applied the round robin and least connections approach of load balancing to HAProxy, virtual machine clusters and web...
Read more >Network Load Balancing Methods - arXiv
Dahlin examines [4] the problem of load balancing in large systems when information about server load is stale. The paper develops strategies that...
Read more >Load Balancing with JET: Just Enough Tracking for ... - Technion
2021. Load Balancing with JET: Just Enough. Tracking for Connection Consistency. In The 17th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and ...
Read more >(PDF) Experimental Setup for Investigating the Efficient Load ...
In this paper, we have applied the round robin and least connections approach of load balancing to HAProxy, virtual machine clusters and web ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Why not provide at least an enumeration or some other type of documentation in code? Need to look at the documentation every time someone is going to use this is kind of a waste of time.
@jbarotin, the API is production-worthy, but there are still some planned changes that could break your code. We’ve gotten really good at adding the new API and then removing the old API, so I’d expect mostly it will be “swap to the new API when you see deprecation warnings” (no promises, but we try pretty hard). Sometimes leaving the old API around is cheap and it may stay there a year. Other times we remove it in the next release.