Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Support WebVTT files
See original GitHub issueI need to process either SRT or VTT files depending on what is available. If I work on adding support for VTT files (which is superset of SRT) would that be something you would consider merging?
I think just stripping the web VTT header and styling when parsing will be a good start. Then VTT input will be supported with SRT output. A further step might be to keep the additional info in the captions array as well, from where it could then be added back in stringify.
I’ll open a PR once I’ve made some progress over the coming days.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Actually, I’m not working on the
parseanymore. You can ignore my commits at development branch. I will focus now on solve the #18 and #19 issues.So, there are no problems if you want to improve the
parseor any other function for now.@marnusw thanks!