Found why best_match has low performance with Levenshtein distance comparision

@gunthercox, @vkosuri, @mymusise

See you guys concern the performance issue for statement get response, what I did for performance improvement may be helpful. The performance improves from 1.9s to 96.8ms by following changes to LevenshteinDistance:

move

import sys
from difflib import SequenceMatcher

to the front of the class.

comment out try … exception … block for library import.

        # import sys
        #
        # # Use python-Levenshtein if available
        # try:
        #     from Levenshtein.StringMatcher import StringMatcher as SequenceMatcher
        # except ImportError:
        #     from difflib import SequenceMatcher

        # PYTHON = sys.version_info[0]

        # Return 0 if either statement has a falsy text value
        # if not statement.text or not other_statement.text:
        #     return 0
        #
        # # Get the lowercase version of both strings
        # if PYTHON < 3:
        #     statement_text = unicode(statement.text.lower()) # NOQA
        #     other_statement_text = unicode(other_statement.text.lower()) # NOQA
        # else:
        #     statement_text = str(statement.text.lower())
        #     other_statement_text = str(other_statement.text.lower())

        statement_text = str(statement.text.lower())
        other_statement_text = str(other_statement.text.lower())

Good luck!

[pylobot]

Yeah Levenshtein.StringMatcher.StringMatcher and difflib.SequenceMatcher are both different libraries. Maybe faster but I think this try/except is because ChatterBot support both Python 2.7 and 3

[zxsimple]

@vkosuri I’ll create PR after fully test