question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Documentation does not mention minimum version HA.

See original GitHub issue

Problem/Motivation

After upgrading to add-on v1.0.0, I could not logon to the WEB UI, using my HA Authentication as this new version mandates. At the time I was running hardware/versions:

-----------------------------------------------------------
 amd64 / Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS / HA 0.79.3 / SU 138 / stable
-----------------------------------------------------------

After upgrade HA to version ‘latest’, I am able to logon again using my HA Authentication credentials, without the need to ‘leave_front_door_open’. Banner now shows:

-----------------------------------------------------------
 amd64 / Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS / HA 0.81.2 / SU 138 / stable
-----------------------------------------------------------

Expected behavior

Be able to logon using my HA Authentication.

Actual behavior

'Access Denied' using my (correct and otherwise working) HA Authentication credentials.

Downgrade to HA v0.79.3.

(How can someone else make/see it happen)

Proposed changes

Perhaps add an update to the documentation, for other users, mentioning the minimal version needed of Home Assistant for this add-on version to be able to logon using the HA Authentication. Initially I wanted to wait with the newer HA 0.8x.x versions, as it breaks my current LoveLace config. If I had know beforehand that this upgrade was needed, I probably would have waited upgrading the add-on.

Thanks!

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 5 years ago
  • Comments:14 (6 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

6reactions
frenckcommented, Oct 31, 2018

Hi @nigel914,

About the testing. This latest update has been pending a long time, because of the testing. All community add-ons are tested against the following:

  • Hass.io setups on a Virtual Machine for development and initial testing.
  • Hass.io on a generic Linux installation (Intel/AMD64 based system on Ubuntu Bionic 18.04 LTS)
  • Hass.io on a Raspberry Pi 3 with HassOS 32-bits (ARMHF)
  • Hass.io on a Raspberry Pi 3B+ with HassOS 64-bits (ARM64)

In fact, it is the amount of testing that caused a delay in the release for weeks (sorry about that), since the following issues were discovered and fixed upstream:

  • home-assistant/hassio#760 (PR, released in Supervisor 137)
  • home-assistant/home-assistant#17465 (PR, released in Home Assistant 0.80.1)
  • home-assistant/home-assistant-js-websocket#59 (Issue by the author of node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket based on issues found).
  • home-assistant/home-assistant-js-websocket#61 (PR, released in HAWS 3.1.5)
  • home-assistant/home-assistant-js-websocket#62 (PR, released in HAWS 3.1.5)
  • home-assistant/home-assistant-js-websocket#63 (PR, released in HAWS 3.1.5)
  • zachowj/node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket#13 (PR, release in node 0.1.3)
  • zachowj/node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket#15 (PR, released in node 0.1.3)

Issues & PR’s still open, but should not affect the current release (at least, not as much as the previous release):

  • home-assistant/home-assistant-js-websocket#65 (Issue)
  • home-assistant/home-assistant-js-websocket#66 (PR)

I know what sarcasm looks like, thanks for mocking me. My response was an “I don’t care response”. You should use whatever you like and feel comfortable with. You don’t have to use any of my things (so please do not use any of the Community add-ons, because, well yeah, that’s almost all my “untested” shit).

At least, thanks for trying the add-on. If you ever feel like testing it again, feel free to join or Discord, so we can help you in case you run into problems. And, if we discover a new issue, I will create a proper fix (or get the right people to help with that) and improve the add-on for the whole community.

Thank you again for being so kind and understanding @nigel914 😉

2reactions
nigel914commented, Oct 31, 2018

@nigel914 LOL, fine. bye.

Signs of a great dev.

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

Prerequisites for Active/Passive HA - Palo Alto Networks
Determine the IP address for the HA1 (control) connection between the HA peers. The HA1 IP address for both peers must be on...
Read more >
Version Control: A Good Practice Guide - University of Glasgow
Version control is the process by which different drafts and versions of a document or record are managed. It is a tool which...
Read more >
High Availability Mode (HA) - Vault - HashiCorp Developer
Vault can be highly available, allowing you to run multiple Vaults to protect against outages.
Read more >
Plan for high availability and site resilience - Microsoft Learn
If the DNS server doesn't accept dynamic updates, you must create a DNS ... In previous versions of Exchange, we recommended at least...
Read more >
Installation system requirements - GitLab Documentation
We highly recommend using at least the minimum PostgreSQL versions (as ... You should not modify the GitLab schema (for example, adding triggers...
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found