Feature Request: Bearer auth
See original GitHub issueHey! Bearer auth (eg. Authorization: Bearer SOME_API_KEY
) is the most commonly used type of authorization header if i’m not wrong.
It would be great to have a bearer auth middleware like BasicAuth.
I’m currently using a hardcoded version myself, so having a built-in one will help save a lot time.
Thanks
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:6
Top Results From Across the Web
[Feature Request] Expose `Authorization: Bearer` token when ...
I think the best solution will involve us creating an internal OIDC forward auth handler that allows Authelia performing the OpenID Connect ...
Read more >Feature: Bearer Authentication | Squid Web Cache wiki
Bearer is an HTTP authentication scheme created as part of OAuth 2.0 in RFC 6750. A client wanting to access to a service...
Read more >Authorizing requests - Postman Learning Center
Bearer tokens enable requests to authenticate using an access key, such as a JSON Web Token (JWT). The token is a text string,...
Read more >Bearer Authentication - Swagger
The name “Bearer authentication” can be understood as “give access to the bearer of this token.” The bearer token is a cryptic string,...
Read more >Generating and using app-only Bearer Tokens | Docs
A bearer token allows developers to have a more secure point of entry for using the Twitter APIs, and are one of the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hey @yusukebe,
Yup, that’s what I expect it to be. When it’s released, I’ll test it in production and give you feedback
Hi @waptik !
I’ve implemented Bearer Auth middleware in this PR #299 . If you can, please check whether it is what you expect. Usage is below: