Consider moving from Seq to List in value types
See original GitHub issueAs discussed in #2086, the new monoid instance for UrlForm
has to duplicate some code from cats-kernel because there is no upstream Monoid[Seq[?]]
instance.
It would be a breaking change, but should the definition of UrlForm
be changed (maybe along with any other type using Seq
)?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Seq.map from one list to populate another list of different type?
Your code is going in the right direction. When using Seq.map (which is like Select in LINQ), you need to turn a single...
Read more >Default Sequence type - Question - Scala Users
That's not quite what I mean. Consider: types like List and Vector are immutable. You can create a new one based on an...
Read more >Built-ins for sequences - Apache FreeMarker Manual
This built-in splits a sequence into multiple sequences of the size given with the 1st parameter to the built-in (like mySeq?chunk(3) ).
Read more >Scala Seq class: Method examples (map, filter, fold, reduce)
I'm currently using Scala 2.12.4, and notice that when I declare a collection to be a Seq , the Scala REPL really gives...
Read more >seq - Maple Help - Maplesoft
The seq function is used to construct a sequence of values. ... Here, x would most commonly be a set or list, but...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Related: https://github.com/http4s/http4s/issues/1695
Duplicate of #1695.