Revisit Logger constraints in Cats-Effect 3
See original GitHub issueIn eca20a5db4b, we had a clash between Sync
and Concurrent
constraints. I ignorantly promoted them all to Async
to make things compile. Maybe there was a better way.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Cats Effect 3 - GitHub
Revisit Logger constraints in Cats-Effect 3 #4131 opened by rossabaker breaking. Change breaks compatibility (binary or source)
Read more >Migration Guide · Cats Effect - Typelevel
Here is an overview of the steps you should take to migrate your application to Cats Effect 3: Make sure your dependencies have...
Read more >Tracing · Cats Effect - Typelevel
IO solves this problem by collecting a stack trace at various IO operations that a fiber executes during its lifetime, and knitting them...
Read more >Tracing · Cats Effect - Typelevel
Introduction. Tracing is an advanced feature of IO that offers insight into the execution graph of a fiber. This unlocks a lot of...
Read more >Tutorial · Cats Effect - Typelevel
Internally cats-effect uses thread pools to run fibers when running on the JVM. So if there is no thread available in the pool...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Arguably, yes. I’d argue the Truly Blessed™ way is to ditch
Sync
and ask for aLoggerFactory
instead.Is this still relevant? I think going up to
Async
is the Blessed way to get bothSync
andConcurrent
.