Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Discussion: download and upload models have a somewhat inconsistent API
See original GitHub issueHi all. Just a small-ish thing to discuss.
Methods that get information about/from repos take the full model id (e.g. hf_api.model_info("osanseviero/my-model") or snapshot_download("osanseviero/my-model)).
On the other hand, create_repo takes as two separate arguments the model name and the organization (if any). I wonder if this could lead to confusions in the future, and, if so, we should check if the name param has a / and determine if there’s an org in there.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:6 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Yes, this is for historic purposes. The first models had no organization and were therefore at the root.
Unfortunately, for backwards compatibility purposes, it is now complicated to change the behavior.
Related: while working on the models’ data in https://observablehq.com/@huggingface/kaggle-dataset-huggingface-modelhub, I have been surprised that some of the "modelId"s are not “user/model”, but just “model” (I understand all of them are models provided by Hugging Face as the organization). eg: https://huggingface.co/bert-base-uncased