Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Replace `eval()` as it is slower and not recommended
See original GitHub issueDon’t use eval() as it is not needed in this context:
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:10 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Replace eval() as it is slower and not recommended #37
Replacing the eval statements with just the require statements seems to fix this problem. Not sure why this works, but it would be...
Read more >eval() is slowing down other code, why? - Stack Overflow
Generally speaking, eval breaks many compiler optimizations. Specifically in this code fragment, it slows down other code because it can take ...
Read more >Everything Wrong With JavaScript `eval()`
Calling eval() will be slower than using alternatives, because it has to call JavaScript interpreter, which will convert evaluated code to ...
Read more >Replace 'eval' for more efficient code - MATLAB Answers
In order to label the output, I'm using 'eval' depending on the conditioning set, but this is extremely slow. Is there a better...
Read more >eval() vs. Function() in JavaScript - Educative.io
Again, eval() is much slower than Function() . However, eval() is also slower than the alternatives since it has to invoke the JavaScript...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Do you understand the purpose of
evalhere? Do you have another proposal?PRs welcome. The size of the client bundle must remain unchanged. We should have this covered with
bundlesize.