bug: fix verify_meta=False usage in dask udfs
See original GitHub issueFix/Remove usage of verify_meta=False
in the dask udf code for scalar outputs as that’s blocking us from updating dask.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Managing Memory — Dask.distributed 2022.12.1 documentation
Dask.distributed stores the results of tasks in the distributed memory of the worker nodes. The central scheduler tracks all data on the cluster...
Read more >Tackling unmanaged memory with Dask - Coiled
Shed light on the common error message “Memory use is high but worker has no data to store to disk. Perhaps some other...
Read more >[dask] [python] lightgbm.dask hangs indefinitely after an error
Reproducible example Using dask and distributed v2021. 10.0, after a run which produces an error out on the cluster, the next test gets...
Read more >Dask Unmanaged Memory | How to Find & Fix | Matt Rocklin
Learn more at https://bit.ly/3Q5aMmpUnmanaged memory often presents as a memory leak, but is actually really easy to identify and resolve.
Read more >How to fix a Dask memory error for database table with over a ...
If anyone has any ideas of how to use dask.dataframe.read_sql_table for reading 100 million row tables it would be greatly appreciated.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I put this fix up https://github.com/ibis-project/ibis/pull/3316, but this implementation required basically doing extracting all the pieces of
dd.from_delayed
besides the meta verification. Given that, I’m going to just close this issue and change my PR to simply remove the shim we don’t need anymore.@gerrymanoim Did you get a chance to look into this?