Omitting breadcrumb for a path
See original GitHub issueThank you for this elegantly simple library!
Quick question: Sometimes routes don’t require a breadcrumb… would it be more flexible to allow for perhaps a null
breadcrumb in order to omit it? Right now doing something silly like using noop
and checking while rendering, but perhaps checking for a present but null
prop instead of throwing an error could be more forgiving?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
KB289961: How to Remove the Breadcrumbs Path but Keep ...
Removing the breadcrumbs path but keeping the navigational buttons using CSS with the MicroStrategy Web SDK 10.5.
Read more >Remove the 'breadcrumb' at top of pages - Press Customizr
To aid navigation, you can use a 'breadcrumb' at the top of pages. However, if you need to remove the 'breadcrumb', the simplest...
Read more >What is Breadcrumb & How It Eases Navigation? (With ... - VWO
Path or History based breadcrumbs. They serve the same purpose as the browser back button, letting a user go back to one of...
Read more >Breadcrumbs - what should they display? - UX Stack Exchange
Don't attempt to base breadcrumbs on the individual user's path through ... Some patterns omit the last item in the interests of brevity....
Read more >Allow path-based breadcrumb overrides [#2987339] | Drupal.org
Allow users to override a generated breadcrumb trail based on the current page's path: Example of rendered breadcrumbs:
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
No worries, and thanks for clarifying - I’ll add support for this soon(ish)!
@icd2k3 yep, exactly! Sorry should of included that detail. Works perfectly otherwise. Thanks!