Support for Node LTS
See original GitHub issueWhy pinning isNewEnough
to a version that’s equal to or greater than 7.6.0
?
Many people use the latest stable LTS version of node in production, currently 6.11.3
.
What about?
- GET the latest LTS version, and then use
>=
against it. - Hardcode
6.11.3
instead of7.6.0
and then regularly update whenever a new LTS version is out.
Thoughts?
If it makes sense, I can PR this.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:8 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Node.js - endoflife.date
Release Released Active Support
19 2 months and 6 days ago. (18 Oct 2022) Ends in 3 months and 1 week. (01 Apr 2...
18...
Read more >Node.js Release Working Group - GitHub
There are three phases that a Node.js release can be in: 'Current', 'Active Long Term Support (LTS)', and 'Maintenance'. Odd-numbered release lines are ......
Read more >Releases - NodeJS Dev
Releases | Node.js. ... LTS release status is "long-term support", which typically guarantees that critical bugs will be fixed for a total of...
Read more >Community support for Node 14 LTS is ending on 30 April 2023
On 30 April 2023, extended support for Node 14 LTS will end. After that date, your applications that are hosted on App Service...
Read more >Node.js
Node.js® is a JavaScript runtime built on Chrome's V8 JavaScript engine. ... Download for Linux (x64). 18.12.1 LTS Recommended For Most Users.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This is great news! I’m going to close up on this ticket since doing nothing gets us this for free shortly.
TypeScript gives enough advantages that it would be more likely to be worth the build step. I’m on board with this.