`cml pr`: Add `--merge` option.
See original GitHub issueIt would be nice to have native support in CML for the cloud-agnostic equivalent of:
gh pr merge --rebase $(cml pr "foo")
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
pr | CML
Automatically merge pull requests The --merge , --rebase , and --squash options enable auto–merge (GitHub) or merge when pipeline succeeds (GitLab) to merge...
Read more >Getting started with merge requests - GitLab Docs
When you start a new merge request, you can immediately include the following options. You can also add them later by either selecting...
Read more >CML Cloud Runners for Model Training in Bitbucket Pipelines
Use CML from a Bitbucket pipeline to provision an AWS EC2 ... Open a pull request that adds the resulting model to our...
Read more >your local changes would be overwritten by checkout - You.com
In case you don't want to commit these changes just yet, another option ... to commit my dvc.lock with cml pr, but when...
Read more >BCR ABL Genetic Test: MedlinePlus Medical Test
A BCR-ABL genetic test helps diagnose CML, a type of leukemia. BCR-ABL is a genetic ... The merged gene is called the BCR-ABL...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Yes, in an ideal world (#762) what is now known as
cml pr
should becml pr create
and it would make sense to have even bothcml pr merge
andcml pr create --merge
I kind of like
--merge
,--rebase
, and--squash
.Maybe off-topic but, would it make any sense to have separate command
cml merge
?So:
cml merge --rebase $(cml pr "output.txt")
?