A new prop for `searchText`?
See original GitHub issueI need a way to query options based on what searchText currently is. As the user is typing.
Can we use the DOM input element value?
Do we need a new prop to bind?
What are your thoughts on this?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Initial Search Prop · Issue #725 · mbrn/material-table - GitHub
Is it possible to specify a default search text as a prop? So far I have tried overriding the MTableToolbar component with a...
Read more >How to pass props to another component in React?
I would recommend a refactor. Move your data and search logic up a level to the parent and pass as props to the...
Read more >The AutocompleteInput Component - React-admin - Marmelab
To allow users to add new options, pass a React element as the create prop. <AutocompleteInput> will then render a menu item at...
Read more >BOB, the Tree and Prop Replacer 0.9.7 - Steam Community
A tool to manage trees and props, including: Replacement with other trees/props;; Hiding (removing);; Changing their position;; Changing their rotation (angle); ...
Read more >Autocomplete component - Vuetify
Sometimes you need to load data externally based upon a search query. Use the search-input prop with the .sync modifier when using the ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

Yeah. You’re right. Not something to debounce in SMS.
I think in that case it makes more sense to debounce your requests rather than the prop, no?
I’m a bit worried about UX suffering from it being less snappy for devs not doing server requests with it (which I assume would be the majority).