Add support for "thread-id" in SimpleApnsPushNotification class
See original GitHub issueThe SimpleApnsPushNotification class is missing the thread-id
attribute, see:
Provide this key with a string value that represents the app-specific identifier for grouping notifications. The system groups notifications with the same thread identifier together in Notification Center and other system interfaces. For local notifications, this key corresponds to the threadIdentifier property of the UNNotificationContent object.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:23 (19 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Add support for "thread-id" in SimpleApnsPushNotification class
Provide this key with a string value that represents the app-specific identifier for grouping notifications. The system groups notifications ...
Read more >SimpleApnsPushNotification (Pushy 0.15.1 API)
Constructs a new push notification with the given token, topic, payload, delivery expiration time, and delivery priority. No push notification type is specified ......
Read more >Index (Pushy 0.13.10 API) - javadoc.io
A utility class for constructing JSON payloads suitable for inclusion in APNs push notifications. ApnsPayloadBuilder() - Constructor for class com.turo.pushy.
Read more >What does the thread-id field actu… | Apple Developer Forums
Hi, everybody! The `thread-id` APNs payload field was introduced earlier this year. According to the APNs docs, users should:.
Read more >Ios "Thread-Id" Doesn't Group Push Notifications - ADocLib
The SimpleApnsPushNotification class is missing the thread-id For local ... OneSignal is a Push Notification service for Web Push, iOS, ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
🤘
Thanks for the detailed explanation, and thanks for the indeed-much-better-description of what we’re looking for. Hope I can return the favor some time!
In the meantime, I’ll update our docs to make reference to the
didReceive
explanation, close the upstream bug report, and update the various forum threads.Cheers!
@petrdvorak that’s what I meant, sorry about that.