Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Support `Literal` type

See original GitHub issue

👋 what are your thoughts on supporting the Literal type?

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 2 years ago
Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

CamDavidsonPiloncommented, Feb 23, 2022

Already trying it 😃

Thanks for devoting time to this, @jcrist!

1reaction

jcristcommented, Feb 10, 2022

Cool, yeah, I can definitely add support for this. Adding it to the queue, thanks for the suggestion!

Top Results From Across the Web

Handbook - Literal Types - TypeScript

There are three sets of literal types available in TypeScript today: strings, numbers, and booleans; by using literal types you can allow an...

Literal types and Enums - mypy 0.991 documentation

Literal types let you indicate that an expression is equal to some specific primitive value. For example, if we annotate a variable with...

C++ named requirements: LiteralType (since C++11)

Specifies that a type is a literal type. Literal types are the types of constexpr variables and they can be constructed, manipulated, ...

PEP 586 – Literal Types - Python Enhancement Proposals

Literal types indicate that a variable has a specific and concrete value. For example, if we define some variable foo to have type...

Support literal tuples types declared with typing.Literal

The user could always express this type as Tuple[Literal[1], Literal["foo"], Literal["bar"]] instead. Matching tuple literals with literal tuple types is not ...