Ability to index documents incrementally
See original GitHub issueThis patch provides the ability to add documents incrementally by using a new add
method in conjunction with an identifyItem
function. It does this by keeping track of the item ids in the indexmap
dictionary where the values are the position into the index of where the item lives.
0001-Provide-the-ability-to-incrementally-add-to-the-inde.patch.zip
Additionally, this patch moves grunt into devDependencies
instead of as a dependency
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Fast Incremental Indexing for Full-Text Information Retrieval
A prerequisite to supporting a growing document collec- tion is the ability to update the data structures used to index the collection. An...
Read more >Introducing incremental enrichment in Azure Cognitive Search
Incremental enrichment is a new feature of Azure Cognitive Search that brings a declarative approach to indexing your data.
Read more >How to index documents - Whoosh - Read the Docs
Incremental indexing ¶ ... When you're indexing a collection of documents, you'll often want two code paths: one to index all the documents...
Read more >Ability to flag documents for re-indexing during an ... - Idea
It would be nice to have the ability to flag documents for re-indexing during the next incremental dtSearch build. We often re-OCR documents...
Read more >lucene: how to perform an incremental indexing and avoid ...
To perform incremental indexing, you should add the last-modified time stamp to the documents of your index, and only index documents that are...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi @mrkishi thanks for your report !
I think it is now fixed. We preallocated the array in _prepSource but then pushed to the end of the array in add. So the whole preallocated space is undefined, which cause error when reading in loop
I’ve added a counter for item that are actually in use.
That was way too fast, thanks! 💯
Took me days to notice it in the first place (since we don’t usually update git-based dependencies).
In any case, it’s on me for not pinning on a specific commit.