Support PostgreSQL version of Aurora Serverless
See original GitHub issueSome compatibility issues were brought up in #25 that show conflicts with the PostgreSQL version (likely because of sqlstring
). There are also some additional data types (like structValue
) that are only supported by the PostgreSQL version.
Overall, I think the two engines are rather interchangeable (thanks for that AWS). We likely need to add an engine
config option or something similar since I don’t think the library can “auto detect” the underlying version.
I’ve created a new development branch (https://github.com/jeremydaly/data-api-client/tree/postgres-support) that should be the target of any pull requests regarding this. Please feel free to add comments to this issue with ideas or compatibility observations.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:7
- Comments:9 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Aurora Serverless v1 and Aurora database engine versions
If you want to use Aurora PostgreSQL for your Aurora Serverless v1 DB cluster, you can choose among Aurora PostgreSQL 10-compatible and 11-compatible...
Read more >Aurora Serverless v1 and Aurora database engine versions
Learn about Aurora Serverless v1 database engine versions.
Read more >Amazon Aurora Supports PostgreSQL 14 - InfoQ
Amazon recently announced that Aurora PostgreSQL supports PostgreSQL major version 14. The new release adds performance improvements and new ...
Read more >What You Should Know About Aurora Serverless Before ...
Only one version of PostgreSQL and MySQL is supported by Aurora Serverless. At the time of writing this, not all or even the...
Read more >Upgrade for Amazon Aurora Serverless v1 PostgreSQL ...
Upgrade for Amazon Aurora Serverless v1 PostgreSQL-compatible edition 10.x end of support is January 31, 2023.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Sorry for the late reply. This is likely due to the support for parametizing identifiers. I think full Postgres support will require a separate config flag.
I am happy to provide a fix for #25 . However, I think we need to deal with the fact that the maintainers of sqlstring will not be adding support for Postgres. Off the top of my head, there are a few options: