Unify the module names of java8 and java5 modules
See original GitHub issueCurrently, java5 modules use different module name (org.jetbrains.annotations.java5
).
This actually doesn’t make any sense to the user——jigswa module names are only used in Java 9 or later, and the same package can only belong to one module. Using a unified module name can reduce the user’s troubles without any negative impact.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5
Top Results From Across the Web
Migrating to Modules - YouTube
This session involves live coding of a simple Java 8 application that ... Module System give you the ability to migrate to modules...
Read more >FasterXML/jackson-modules-java8: Set of support ... - GitHub
Set of support modules for Java 8 datatypes (Optionals, date/time) and features (parameter names) - GitHub - FasterXML/jackson-modules-java8: Set of support ...
Read more >contents - The Java Module System - liveBook · Manning
3.4 The module path: Letting Java know about modules ... 8.3.1 Automatic module names: Small detail, big impact · 8.3.2 Module ... What...
Read more >The Java Module System [Book] - O'Reilly
The Java Module System is your in-depth guide to creating and using Java modules. With detailed examples and easy-to-understand diagrams, you'll learn the ......
Read more >Understanding Java 9 Modules | Oracle Malaysia
What Is a Module? · the module's name · the module's dependencies (that is, other modules this module depends on) · the packages...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ok, implemented via e1f9f35d61521652abcb65d29cd3637ed4a344a1. It would be nice if you test the snapshot on your setup before we release a new version. Thanks.
@1951FDG googling your error message yields this SO answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/60719508/4856258 Hope this helps.