[Parallel(n_jobs=5)]: Using backend SequentialBackend with 1 concurrent workers.
See original GitHub issueWhen I put nested parallel jobs I get the following message:
[Parallel(n_jobs=5)]: Using backend SequentialBackend with 1 concurrent workers.
Which does not allow me to run some part of the code in parallel, how can I fix it?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
What needs to be done to make n_jobs work properly on ...
n_jobs = 8, perf_counter = 1.465600558090955 ([Parallel(n_jobs=1)]: Using backend SequentialBackend with 1 concurrent workers.) n_jobs = 12, ...
Read more >Using backend SequentialBackend with 1 concurrent workers
I was trying to execute the following code as given here in my Jupyter notebook: fig = raw.plot_psd(tmax=np.inf, fmax=250, average=True) ...
Read more >How to increase parallel jobs while training?
Fitting 2 folds for each of 6 candidates, totalling 12 fits [Parallel(n_jobs=1)]: Using backend SequentialBackend with 1 concurrent workers.
Read more >Using backend LokyBackend with 4 concurrent workers.
I have "Using backend LokyBackend with 4 concurrent workers" written when I am using GridSearchCV. According to me, this has to do something...
Read more >Python for Support Vector Machines - RPubs
... return_train_score=False, scoring=None, verbose=1) [Parallel(n_jobs=1)]: Using backend SequentialBackend with 1 concurrent workers.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
It seems like your program is trying to serialize the
backend
object. One you have set thebackend
object in the outer most call toParallel
, it will be passed automatically to the children so you don’t need to set it in the inner call. Does this solve your issue?Great! Thanks for the feedback.