Python type hints
See original GitHub issuePEP 484 and PEP 526 introduced the concept of “type hints” which allow Python code to have inline type declarations to make it easier for editors and static analysis tools to work with Python code.
def add(a: int, b: int) -> int:
return a + b
To maintain Python 2.7 compatibility, we’d have to use the comment-based syntax:
def add(a, b):
# type: (int, int) -> int
return a + b
Is this something that might be worthwhile for us to implement?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:7 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
typing — Support for type hints — Python 3.11.1 documentation
This module provides runtime support for type hints. The most fundamental support consists of the types Any , Union , Callable , TypeVar...
Read more >Type hints cheat sheet - mypy 0.991 documentation
Type hints cheat sheet#. This document is a quick cheat sheet showing how to use type annotations for various common types in Python....
Read more >Type Hinting - Real Python
In this lesson, you'll learn about type hinting in Python. Type hinting is a formal solution to statically indicate the type of a...
Read more >Python Type Hints
Python's type hints provide you with optional static typing to leverage the best of both static and dynamic typing. The following example defines...
Read more >Get started with Python type hints | InfoWorld
Type hints in Python involve a colon and a type declaration after the first invocation of a name in a namespace. An example:...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Python type hints have since been added and are being improved upon. Perhaps it is okay to close this?
I see, the library supports Python 2 as well and so the parameter type has to be more flexible. Considering also the problem of the argument changing name, I think the added value of type hinting in this case is not worth it