question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

5.0.0 Test suite broken on Node.js 8.x and 9.x

See original GitHub issue
  • Operating System: OSX
  • Node.js version: 8.x / 9.x
  • fs-extra version: 5.0.0 || master

The test for this module is not currently passing with Node.js 8.x or 9.x. and it appears to be 0bd52793a2e15b593ce3f19167d2550e822665a3 that broke it

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 6 years ago
  • Comments:14

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

1reaction
MylesBorinscommented, Jan 10, 2018

Indeed, sorry for not being exact

On Jan 10, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Ryan Zimmerman notifications@github.com wrote:

@MylesBorins https://github.com/mylesborins I assume you mean https://github.com/nodejs/node https://github.com/nodejs/node when you say the main repo?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/issues/536#issuecomment-356628356, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecVzXGxxLTAtjMn_302WG5eYwAfpkIks5tJNECgaJpZM4RY1jo.

1reaction
MylesBorinscommented, Jan 10, 2018

You should open an issue against the main repo… This may be something broken in libuv

On Jan 10, 2018 9:45 AM, “Ryan Zimmerman” notifications@github.com wrote:

This is weird; it seems the Node.js copyFile and copyFileSync methods aren’t consistent between Mac and Linux. On Mac, it seems to always preserve timestamps, while the timestamp is changed on Linux. Here’s a test case repo: https://github.com/RyanZim/fs-copy-file-test Note that this is testing the fs methods directly; not fs-extra. The tests pass on Linux, as the timestamps are changed; they fail on Mac since the timestamps are preserved.

I’m not sure how fs-extra should handle this.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/issues/536#issuecomment-356622984, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV10JVQAWkfeDHad2VddVi5dC8kI6ks5tJM0FgaJpZM4RY1jo .

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

v5 used to include polyfills for node.js core modules by default
node_modules/dotenv/lib' BREAKING CHANGE: webpack < 5 used to include polyfills for node.js core modules by default. This is no longer the ...
Read more >
The engine "node" is incompatible with this module
Finally, I got it to work by purging the old nodeJs then adding different repository source, and installing nodeJs normally with the new ......
Read more >
Porting to the Buffer.from() / Buffer.alloc() API - Node.js
Variant 1: Drop support for Node.js ≤ 4.4.x and 5.0.0 — 5.9.x ... In particular, it will show the Buffer() deprecation warning, even...
Read more >
Firebase JavaScript SDK Release Notes - Google
Version 9.8.0 - May 06, 2022. As of this version, Internet Explorer 11 is no longer officially supported by the Firebase JavaScript SDK....
Read more >
Getting Started | QUnit
Getting started with QUnit for Node.js projects is quick and easy. ... The 0.x and 1.x versions of the “qunit” package on npm...
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found