Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Will jupyterlab-sidecar be further maintained and ported to Jupyterlab 2.x?
See original GitHub issueCurrently the prerequisites in package.json are
"@jupyter-widgets/jupyterlab-manager": "^1.0.0",
"@jupyterlab/application": "^1.0.0"
which from my understanding are not compatible with Jupyterlab 2.x And there might be other changes necessary …
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:8 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
JupyterLab 3 support? · Issue #34 - GitHub
The development workflow is a little weird, more like the ... @jupyter-widgets/jupyterlab-sidecar seems to be already "ported" to JL3, ...
Read more >JupyterLab Changelog — JupyterLab 3.6.0b0 documentation
The undo/redo history in the notebook is now document-wide (tracking changes across all cells); the future verisions will enable restoring the previous ...
Read more >JupyterLab 3.0 is released - Jupyter Blog
The 3.0 release of JupyterLab brings many new features to users and substantial improvements to the extension system.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Hey @bernhard-42 yes absolutely. This has just been a question of bandwidth as we maintain many extensions. If you feel like opensing a PR to port it to 2.0, that would be awesome!
Presumably, though I haven’t tested it.