Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Support proto3 optional keyword

See original GitHub issue

This commit adds support for optional in proto3.

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 3 years ago
Reactions:3
Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

2reactions

jvolkmancommented, Feb 22, 2021

Thanks for the note.

2reactions

z0mb1ekcommented, Aug 9, 2020

hi. when will it be released?

Top Results From Across the Web

How to define an optional field in protobuf 3 - Stack Overflow

Since protobuf release 3.15, proto3 supports using the optional keyword (just as in proto2) to give a scalar field presence information.

Language Guide | Protocol Buffers - Google Developers

You can add fields of any type, but cannot use the required , optional , or repeated keywords. If you need to add...

How To Implement Field Presence for Proto3 - GitHub

All code generators will need to be updated to support proto3 optional fields. ... The optional keyword was chosen to minimize differences with...

Optional fields - Embedded Proto

As of Google Protobuf version 3.15, optional fields are reintroduced in proto3. Embedded Proto supports optional fields as of version 2.3.0.

Optional GRPC fields support : IDEA-285457 - YouTrack

proto:45:14: Explicit 'optional' labels are disallowed in the Proto3 syntax. To define 'optional' fields in Proto3, simply remove the 'optional' label, as ...