why performance is different from what is reported?
See original GitHub issueI am using the pretrained weights that is provided on website faster_rcnn_1_6_10021.pth
but i get different performance from what is reported on the website. am i doing something wrong?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
The difference between performance reporting and ... - CIPS
The same is true in the business world. A company's annual report will show financial performance over the year, which is helpful for...
Read more >The Necessity Of Performance Reporting
Performance reporting focuses on different objectives depending on the project, team, and business. As a result, reports are produced in a ...
Read more >What are the major difference between REPORTING an...
While with Performance Analytics, it's different. It extracts data from tables regularly and stores it.
Read more >What is Performance Reporting in the Project Management?
Performance reporting in Project Management conveys different Project parameters to various stakeholders to decide the communication ...
Read more >Performance Report: What is it & How to Create it? (Steps ...
A performance report is a document that a company creates to define and measure its overall success. It provides an overview of how...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I’ll refer you to the observations of this issue: https://github.com/jwyang/faster-rcnn.pytorch/issues/419
It seems that PyTorch-1.0 and PyTorch-0.4.0 have a slight mismatch in their way to training the model. So the results are re-usable, but they will be off.
This leaves you with 3 options:
almost same as you.Did you train the model youself? And did you get the mAp=70.6 or around it?