Enhancement to --human-readable output
See original GitHub issueFirstly, let me say thank you for adding the human readable output option. It is working great so far with my testing!
I was hoping you could add another option to make the human readable name in the file name as well? This makes it easy to provide to software a bunch of these files and have output we can understand. Not quite sure how versions would work though.
Current:
human_readable/genbank/bacteria/Dichelobacter/nodosus/VCS1703A/GCA_000015345.1_ASM1534v1_genomic.gbff.gz
Alternate suggested:
human_readable/genbank/bacteria/Dichelobacter/nodosus/VCS1703A/Dichelobacter_nodosus_VCS1703A.gbff.gz
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:16 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Human-readable output for SimpleMeterRegistry #1527 - GitHub
Instrument some local test project, where you want to benchmark different approaches and output human-readable stats. The implementation I have ...
Read more >Generating Semantically Similar and Human-Readable ...
The generator, which can be considered as a sequence-to-sequence model, takes raw text as input and generates word sequence as summary output.
Read more >Readable Format - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Data appending procedures convert the input data sets to UI readable formats. A detailed representation of the data appending algorithm used in the...
Read more >JSON Enhancements - InterSystems Developer Community
First of all, it helps if you can format JSON to make it more human-readable. This is very handy when you have to...
Read more >How to format ansible logs in a human readable way
We use this in our ansible.cfg : stdout_callback = yaml. This gives a more readable YAML output instead of JSON. If that doesn't...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
That said, can we move the discussion of alternative download strategies into a different issue? I’d like to keep this one about human-readable file names.
Yeah, I think generating a list of things to
rsync
and using the--files-from
parameter would be the way to go if rsync support is what is desired. I personally have no interest in supporting non-OSS tools, but I certainly would be happy to accept patches adding support for aspera as well.The main reason that I didn’t add
rsync
support so far is thatrsync
transfers are single-threaded, unless you spend some extra work to split the source files and then use a process pool to fork and execute multiplersync
processes. I don’t see a big benefit over the existing HTTP transfer method.