Add support for UFW
See original GitHub issueHello,
First of all, I would like to thank the creators / contributors of this lib, it is very useful for my projects !
I want know if it possible to add support for ufw command, like ufw status
😃
Thank’s
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:24 (15 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
UFW Essentials: Common Firewall Rules and Commands
UFW (uncomplicated firewall) is a firewall configuration tool that runs on top of iptables, included by default within Ubuntu distributions.
Read more >UFW - Community Help Wiki - Official Ubuntu Documentation
UFW - Uncomplicated Firewall. The default firewall configuration tool for Ubuntu is ufw. Developed to ease iptables firewall configuration, ufw ...
Read more >How to Set Up a Firewall with UFW on Ubuntu 20.04
We've shown you how to install and configure a UFW firewall on your Ubuntu 20.04 server. Be sure to allow all incoming connections...
Read more >How to Configure a Firewall with UFW
Learn how to use UFW (Uncomplicated Firewall) to manage your firewall on Ubuntu, Debian, or Arch Linux.
Read more >How To Configure Firewall with UFW on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
1 Set up ufw policy · 2 Open SSH port · 3 Turn on ufw firewall · 4 Open ports with ufw ·...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
It’s okay for me, haven’t seen any bug, nice job ! I’ll use it to make an firewall rules editor on my app
Looking great, what’s the behavior if there’s a range for the port, like my screen, line 4
And what’s the behavior for apps ? If you use the following command :
ufw allow openssh
In
rules
you can changenumber
byindex
, because it’s the index for the rule, right ?What’s the
new_profiles
field purpose ? Btw, I didn’t know if you can get the rules when UFW is disabled– I think you can split for the subnet, because if I use this parser, I prefer to have all part of a field separately, same for logging_level.
PS: flat object is really good, I’ve done some deep object, but it’s not a really good way… PPS: If you can convert words like “Anywhere” to something more like “0.0.0.0” it could be nice too…