instance.resolve and instance.compose methods
See original GitHub issueWould be nice to have a capturing resolve and compose methods exposed… resolve would effectively return the matching route and parameters for a given url.
instance.resolve('http://server/foo/some%20%2B%20id');
// returns { route: '/foo/:id', params: { id: "some + id" } } - decodeURIComponent
instance.compose('/foo/:id', { id: "some + id" });
// return '/foo/some%20%2B%20id' - encodeURIComponent
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Jetpack Compose basics
1. Before you begin · 2. Starting a new Compose project · 3. Getting started with Compose · 4. Tweaking the UI ·...
Read more >Resolvers - graphql-compose
resolve method which contains your bussiness logic, for fetching, processing and returning data. BE AWARE: that all arguments (source, args, context, info) are ......
Read more >Gotchas in Jetpack Compose Recomposition
Recomposition in Jetpack Compose is the mechanism in which state changes are reflected within an app's UI. To accomplish this, Compose will ...
Read more >Jetpack Compose Stability Explained | by Ben Trengrove
Immutable — Indicates a type where the value of any properties will never change after the object is constructed, and all methods are ......
Read more >Using profiles with Compose
Profiles allow adjusting the Compose application model for various usages and environments by selectively ... As an example consider this configuration:.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@foxdonut @iaminstanceof ahahah wow sorry guys spelling mistake! Ill get right on that!
@kevindurb I think what @iaminstanceof meant was
sunscribers
should besubscribers
😉