User Federation LDAP: `Remove imported users` modal has wrong text
See original GitHub issueWhen you select action Remove imported users
, the text in the modal says,
Do you really want to remove all imported users? The option "Unlink users" makes sense just for the Edit Mode "Unsynced" and there should be a warning that "unlinked" users without the password in the Keycloak database won't be able to authenticate.
I believe that this text came from the wireframe is intended as instructions for the developer.
@andymunro @yih-wang We need more specific text for the modal(s).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:6 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
`Remove imported users` modal has wrong text · Issue #1395 ...
When you select action Remove imported users, the text in the modal says, Do you really want to remove all imported users?
Read more >[KEYCLOAK-2644] Delete user with a READ_ONLY LDAP ...
When users are linked to a federated LDAP READ_ONLY source after logging in one time, there is no way to remove this linkage...
Read more >Server Administration Guide - Keycloak
User Federation - Sync users from LDAP and Active Directory ... Keycloak shows an error anytime a user attempts to update these fields....
Read more >LDAP Keycloak Integration - VMware Docs
Create a new instance of User Federation for LDAP. ... The Import Users value is set to Of, and all other parameters depend...
Read more >OpenLDAP Software 2.4 Administrator's Guide
This section gives an overview of LDAP from a user's perspective. ... this is to give up any hopes of implementing the directory...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@jonkoops Sounds good to me.
This makes sense to me, I can make the changes. @ssilvert WDYT?