Overdue changes to support Hierarchical Account
See original GitHub issueFor all the existing overdue handlers in OverdueListener
the code needs to now detect when this is parent account and propagate the changes to the children (in addition to itself).
OverduePoster
needs to be called to create a new notification for each child so processing happens asynchronously
Tests:
- Create unit in overdue with one parent and a few children
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Overdue changes - ServiceNow Docs
Overdue changes · On the My team dashboard, tap on Overdue changes on the applet. · If you want to reduce the number...
Read more >Why Hierarchy Is Outdated: The (Long Overdue ... - Forbes
Hierarchy is outdated. The age-old system originally designed by the military and adopted by corporate America has been rendered obsolete ...
Read more >Handling Overdue Requests
If the age of a request exceeds the request duration configured for the workflow model or the due date configured for the request,...
Read more >How do I change when Overdue Notices go out with ILLiad?
Answer. For Lending Overdue Notices, see the Atlas Systems Lending Overdue Notices documentation. For Borrowing Overdue Notices, see the ATLAS ...
Read more >Can I create a list of overdue Prime Contract Change Orders ...
To help you avoid any setbacks, the project's Prime Contracts tool lets users with 'Admin' permission on the Prime Contracts and Reports tool...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@matias-aguero-hs I see… our api is a bit confusing (and broken in my opinion) and you just took advantage of that: We allow to pass both an
accountId
and a context (which contains anaccountRecordId
). The assumption is that bothaccountId
andaccountRecordId
should point to same account, but there is nothing enforcing that, so what you described is correct.At some point we will need to revisit that (at the very least add some comments) and a better solution would be to remove
accountId
and simply rely on the context. This is fine for now. Nothing to do. Let’s move on.You’re right, the code is sending
childAccount
object andparentAccountContext
. The unpaid invoices are retrieving by context and childAccount object is used to build the BillingState object result. That’s why the code is using both accounts.