Type checker false-positive: a let-in function w/ type annotation & type vars
See original GitHub issueRunning the elm compiler:
Running elm make:
romario ~/R/g/elm-frontend *develop λ elm make src/elm/Main.elm --output=elm.js
Success! Compiled 1 module.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:13 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Type hints cheat sheet - mypy 0.991 documentation
This document is a quick cheat sheet showing how to use type annotations for various common types in Python. Variables#. Technically many of...
Read more >Leptin receptor deficiency: a systematic literature review and ...
Objective Leptin receptor (LepR) deficiency is an autosomal-recessive endocrine disorder causing early-onset severe obesity, hyperphagia and pituitary ...
Read more >Understanding type annotation in Python
In this extensive post with specific examples, learn how to use Python type annotation to your advantage using the mypy library.
Read more >Potential parameters for the detection of hGH doping
By using the suggested discriminant function the data sets of hGH and placebo-treated athletes could be separated without false positive results.
Read more >Leptin alters energy intake and fat mass but not ...
Leptin treatment is effective to reduce body weight in animal models, ... and type of leptin deficiency (CLD, GL, and PL) and leptin...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@romariolopezc thanks!
@ajalt looks like a bug in type inference, both in version 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 (which was just released this morning).
Thanks for the report and the reproduction. This is a duplicate of #402. I’ll post an update on that issue.