Conditional receive on channel
See original GitHub issueSomething like channel.receiveWhen { predicate }
. Might be useful if there are multiple worker coroutines, each one processing its own subset of elements.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
producer consumer - Conditional Go Routine/Channel
My main issue is getting the conditional channel to run without causing deadlock. – pdago. Jul 8, 2015 at 3:31. Looks like the ......
Read more >Conditional Channel Gated Networks for Task-Aware ... - arXiv
In this work, we introduce a novel framework to tackle this problem with conditional computation. We equip each convolutional layer with ...
Read more >Conditional in Head to detect channel
When I put out the channel in the comments I'll see another channel and not the blog post or recipe channel that it's...
Read more >Channels - A Tour of Go
Channels are a typed conduit through which you can send and receive ... This allows goroutines to synchronize without explicit locks or condition...
Read more >Conditional Percentile Channels - CSSA - WordPress.com
In either case, the general spirit remains the same and readers are encouraged to take a look at his analysis of the strategy....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@fvasco The key difference here is that an element sent to
Channel
is never lost. It must be received. However, an element sent toBroadcastChannel
will be lost if there are no subscribers. It is especially important when creating back-end pipelines to process event, perform protocol conversion, etc.It is abandoned for a reason. Thanks for bringing attention to it. It is conceptually really hard to implement. If you need something like it, then launch a separate coroutine to perform filtering, so that it sends the correspondingly filtered items to the appropriate downsteam channels.