Reentrant lock
See original GitHub issueIs reentrant lock for coroutines on the roadmap?
I’ve seen a discussion of it where a problem of coroutine identity was raised (https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines/issues/965). But couldn’t a Job
in the coroutine context be that identity?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:19 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
ReentrantLock (Java Platform SE 7 ) - Oracle Help Center
A ReentrantLock is owned by the thread last successfully locking, but not yet unlocking it. A thread invoking lock will return, successfully acquiring...
Read more >Reentrant Lock in Java - GeeksforGeeks
The ReentrantLock class implements the Lock interface and provides synchronization to methods while accessing shared resources. The code which ...
Read more >What is the Re-entrant lock and concept in general?
A reentrant lock is one where a process can claim the lock multiple times without blocking on itself. It's useful in situations where...
Read more >Java Lock Example - ReentrantLock - DigitalOcean
ReentrantLock : This is the most widely used implementation class of Lock interface. This class implements the Lock interface in similar way ...
Read more >ReentrantLock Example in Java, Difference between ...
As per Javadoc, ReentrantLock is a mutual exclusive lock, similar to implicit locking provided by synchronized keyword in Java, with extended features like ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
There is already a nice example of solution from Roman Elizarov here https://elizarov.medium.com/phantom-of-the-coroutine-afc63b03a131
IMO, not including reentrant mutex into the library so that you have to actually spend some time on copying the implementation of the reentrant mutex into your code and thinking on whether you really need it, works better than any
@herebedragons
annotation would.