How to train the model for x8 scale?
See original GitHub issueThanks for creating this repo and very helpful blog post.
I tried inference x2 and x4 of EDSR model and it is good.
I’m changing source code to train for x8 model. In the upsampling
method of model/edsr.py
, I change it like this
The training code of x8 run for 10000 step but the PSNR is just around 15. How should I update the EDSR training code for x8?
Thanks in advance.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:13 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Fine-tuning at x8 up-sampling · Issue #233 - GitHub
Hello, The general image up-sampling model RealESRGAN_x4plus is doing a good job and it makes fine-tuning rather easy.
Read more >Scale & Gauge - cs.wisc.edu
Scale is something you see with model railroads, it is the proportion or fraction of size of the real or prototype.
Read more >100 4x8 HO Layouts ideas in 2022 | model railway track plans ...
Dec 19, 2022 - Explore Ron's board "4x8 HO Layouts" on Pinterest. See more ideas about model railway track plans, model train layouts,...
Read more >5 Remarkable N Scale Layouts 4x8 - Model Train Books
4'x8′ layouts provide more versatility to construct more realistic prototypes and can provide enough room for scenic views as well. Continue reading and...
Read more >How (Not) To Scale Deep Learning in 6 Easy Steps - Databricks
That process does, however, require training lots of models in a ... When increasing the batch size by 8x, it's typically advisable to ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I’d expect it is able to learn that to some extend.
A proper solution would be to center-crop the HR image, using the SR image size as crop window. Resizing recomputes all pixel values via (bilinear, bicubic, …) interpolation which may explain the low PSNR values you see during validation.
Exactly, this must be done for all model implementations. What you proposed for up-sampling looks good to me (didn’t see the “wrong” names in your first proposal).